You are here

111th Congress Did Well When it Comes to National Park Wilderness, But It Could Have Done Better

Share

A review of how the 111th Congress acted on wilderness legislation shows that the National Park System benefited quite nicely, but it could have fared better.

According to Frank Buono, a former National Park Service official who now tracks wilderness issues, "the 111th Congress designated wilderness in more separate park units (6) than in any Congress since 1980 in the Carter Administration."

That said, he notes that "the number of acres designated was dwarfed by the park wilderness in the 1980 Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, and in the California Desert Protection Act of 1994."

As, it seems, with any other legislation coming out of Washington these days, the wilderness provisions at times cover more than wilderness issues. For instance, notes Mr. Buono, "(T)he 111th Congress also adopted a provision that is unprecedented in the history of National Park System wilderness. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) inserted a provision into an Interior Appropriations Act to allow the Secretary to permit for a ten-year period a commercial aquaculture operation in an area of designated potential wilderness in Point Reyes National Seashore, California.

"Specifically, Section 124 of the Interior Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (October 30, 2009) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to renew a permit for a commercial oyster farm in Drakes Bay, an area designated as potential wilderness in 1976, for a ten year period, beginning on November 30, 2012," he notes. "The authorization for the oyster farm in the Drakes Bay Estero was due to expire in 2012. At that point the nonconforming use would have ceased, enabling the NPS to convert the potential wilderness into full wilderness by publication of a Federal Register notice."

Here's a recap of recent congressional action on wilderness issues from Mr. Buono:

Senator Thomas Coburn (R-OK) almost single-handedly blocked any wilderness designation in the ending days of the 110th Congress. In response, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) placed an omnibus federal lands bill at the top of the Senate calendar in 2009. The 111th Congress hit the ground running on park wilderness, and other public land issues. On March 30, 2009, President Obama signed into law Public Law 111-11. The law designated wilderness in six areas of the national park system. They are (in alphabetical order):

1. Joshua Tree National Park (California) - Congress designated 36,700 additional acres of wilderness and 43,300 acres of potential wilderness in Joshua Tree. The new wilderness came on lands that were Joshua Tree by the California Desert Protection Act of 1994. Joshua Tree became the first park in which Congress acted on three separate instances to designate wilderness.

2. Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore (Michigan) - Congress designated 11,740 acres as the Beaver Basin Wilderness in Pictured Rocks.

3. Rocky Mountain National Park (Colorado) - Congress designated approximately 249,339 acres of Rocky Mountain National Park as wilderness.

4/5. Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (California) - Congress established the John Krebs Wilderness in the Mineral King area of Sequoia National Park, encompassing 39,740 acres and 130 acres of potential wilderness. Congress also designated 45,186 additional acres of wilderness in the Sequoia-Kings Canyon Wilderness. The John Krebs Wilderness is one of only three NPS wilderness areas where Congress did not make the references in the Wilderness Act to the “Secretary of Agriculture” applicable to the “Secretary of the Interior.” Thus the “special provisions” in the Wilderness Act found at section 4(d) are inoperative in the John Krebs.

6. Zion National Park (Utah) - Congress designated 124,406 acres of Zion as wilderness. Zion is one of the three NPS wilderness areas where Congress did not make the references in the Wilderness Act to the “Secretary of Agriculture” applicable to the “Secretary of the Interior.” Thus, the “special provisions” in the Wilderness Act found at section 4(d) are inoperative at Zion.

The 111th Congress designated wilderness (including potential wilderness) within the National Park System of approximately 550,000 acres.

While the additions certainly are welcome, the list of parks that have no officially designated wilderness is not short and, in some cases, quite surprising. For instance, neither Yellowstone nor Glacier have officially designated wilderness. Nor do Canyonlands, Voyageurs, Grand Canyon, Great Smoky Mountains, Big Bend, Grand Teton, Craters of the Moon National Monument, Cumberland Gap National Historical Park, or Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.

Wilderness designations can be contentious issues. Mining interests oppose them because they can put potential reserves out-of-bounds. Developers can't open up roads. And even mountain bikes can't negotiate them because of The Wilderness Act's prohibition against any "form of mechanical transport."

How important are the designations? In places such as Glacier or Yellowstone probably not overly so, as the rough and rugged backcountry of these places is managed for their wilderness qualities and not likely to be intruded upon by roads or structures. At the same time, lacking official wilderness designations, these landscapes could still be eyed for communication towers or mountain bike trails, Park Service officials have noted.

Featured Article

Comments

Kurt Repanshek:
Has the senator's rider fundamentally changed things? It doesn't direct the Interior Department to extend the lease, but only gives it the authority to do so.

It's certainly the opinion of quite a few opponents of that rider that it does fundamentally change things. I've personally felt that the NPS or Interior Dept could extend it with a different opinion from a change of administration. However - the lead for this was previously the NPS administration, while the rider planted the authority with the Secretary. Now NPS Director Jon Jarvis is unlikely to shift his stand on the matter after being so invested in trying to defend the actions of PRNS. I doubt Secretary Salazar has enough background on it that he's biased one way or the other. Certainly the rider may have been a "strong suggestion" meant to win hearts and minds among Interior Dept personnel - especially Secretary Salazar.


Actually Craters of the Moon has had designated wilderness since 1970 - it was one of the first wilderness areas administered by the NPS. http://www.nps.gov/archive/crmo/wildpurpose.htm


Kurt, I was just wondering if the newly added wilderness in the 4 places you site, were run by the NPS before, or will there be new costs in it's management. And if there are new costs, does the legislation come with a boost to the budget. As I have said before, I am all for our parks growing...I just see it a problem when they want to shrink the budget.


"At the same time, lacking official wilderness designations, these landscapes could still be eyed for communication towers or mountain bike trails, Park Service officials have noted."

Sorry for being late to this thread, but I just could not let it go. Man, that says a lot about the anti cycling bias of the park service, equating communication towers with mountain biking. This is especially funny since there is no such thing (to my knowledge) as a dedicated MTB trail in the NPS (unless you're talking about fireroad that nobody uses...). Cyclists only want access to multi use trails. What's especially galling in this comment is that it implies that mountain biking would not be an appropriate usage for a park. It's just plain sad.


Zeb, there's multi-use biking/hiking trails in Mammoth Cave National Park, Whiskeytown NRA has some great single-track, one of our new sponsors, Holiday River Expeditions, offers a mountain bike trip in the Maze District of Canyonlands National Park, there's a 2.5-mile-long hiking/biking trail at Saguaro National Park, and I know the folks at Big Bend NP have been trying to approve a mountain bike trail.

These are just off the top of my head. I'd venture there are other opportunities out there.


Oh, almost forgot. At New River Gorge National River they're seeking comments on a plan to develop two “stacked loop” single-track trail systems that would blend beginner, intermediate, and expert loops systems together.


Point Reyes NS has several multi-use trails open to bicycles. There are even three backcountry campgrounds that could be accessed via bicycle.

The trails open to bikes are in dotted red:

http://www.nps.gov/pore/planyourvisit/upload/map_park.pdf


Guys,

I did not make my point clearly. The comment I quoted implied that the NPS official was worried about "MTB trails", which I took to mean MTB dedicated trails, hence my comment about the park not having MTB ONLY trails. I understand that the NPS has quite a few (but definitely not enough) multi use trails.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.