You are here

Pruning the Parks: Shoshone Cavern National Monument (1909-1954) Would Have Cost Too Much to Develop


Shoshone Cavern. NPS photo by F.J. Hiscock.

Shoshone Cavern National Monument was abolished 54 years ago. When a national park’s name is deleted from the rolls like this, and no longer identifies a discrete unit of the National Park System, the passage of time makes it easier to forget that a park bearing that name ever existed. This is not only true for delisted/decommissioned parks like Shoshone Cavern National Monument, but also for parks whose resources remain in the Park System. Redesignations, mergers, and related actions have swept many park names into the dustbin of history.

Park System history is loaded with park names that are, or will soon become, little more than historical footnotes. For three short years, Lafayette National Park was the official name of the place we now call Acadia National Park. Fort Jefferson National Monument was a national park for 56 years, but you haven’t been able to visit a place by that name since Dry Tortugas National Park was established in 1992. Zion National Park used to be Mukuntuweap National Monument, but few people alive today have any personal recollection of visiting a place that stopped using that name 90 years ago.

Every one of the many now-defunct park names is linked to an interesting story, some of which have been narrated already in Traveler. I’ll be relating more of these stories – and others about park-elated people, places, and events of historical interest -- in a new Traveler series called “Gone, But Not Forgotten.” We’ll try this Gone, But Not Forgotten thing about once a week or so and see if it works out. Historical perspective is important, but we don’t want to overdo it. Traveler’s prime focus is – and will remain -- the reporting, analyzing, discussing, and productive exchange of information and ideas about management of the National Park System now and in the future.

Shoshone Cavern National Monument is first on the docket for this new series, and I hope you’ll agree that it’s an interesting little story. I welcome your suggestions for other Gone, But Not Forgotten topics.

Shoshone Cavern National Monument in Wyoming was established by presidential proclamation on September 21, 1909. On May 17, 1954, an act of Congress abolished the park, which had already been transferred to the city of Cody, Wyoming, in 1951. This long-gone park’s story illustrates the familiar dictum: “Err in haste, repent at leisure.”

The main problem with Shoshone Cavern National Monument was there from the git-go. It wasn’t one of the country’s most geologically significant or recreationally appealing caves, and it was very difficult to get to and tour. The cave is interesting, yes. “Buffalo Bill” Cody himself even visited it. But America has many caves of better quality and greater visitor interest than this one.

If Shoshone Cavern is not worthy of national park status, why was it made a national park? Why did it remain on the national parks roles for 46 years? These are very good questions.

Shoshone Cavern was just the ninth national monument created by presidential proclamation as authorized by the Antiquities Act (approved June 8, 1906). Under the terms of the act the president was authorized “….in his discretion, to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments."

Not even four full years had passed since the president acquired this authority, and there was still a great deal of uncertainty and concern surrounding this method of establishing national parks. The prime unknowns were these: Would a high standard of quality or worthiness be maintained in the absence of Congressional vetting? Would the president allow political considerations to unduly influence his decisions about which parks to create by proclamation?

The case of Shoshone National Monument showed that creating parks by presidential proclamation can burden the park system with a minor park whose development and operation can’t be fit into a chronically tight budget.

University of Wyoming History Professor Phil Roberts, an expert on Wyoming history, has written a manuscript and lectured about the circumstances surrounding the creation and eventual delisting of Shoshone Caverns National Monument. Dr. Roberts points out that the national monument was created in response to local pressure for a federally-funded tourist attraction that would bring more national publicity and tourist dollars to the Cody area. Creating the park would also serve the interests of the Burlington Railroad, which provided passenger service to this part of Wyoming.

Here is a description of the park in an annual report on national monuments published in 1913, four years after President Taft proclaimed Shoshone Cavern National Monument.

The Shoshone Cavern National Monument embraces 210 acres of rough, mountainous land. The cavern entrance is located upon the north face of Cedar Mountain, about 3 miles east of the great Shoshone Dam in Big Horn County, Wyo. From its entrance the cavern runs in a southwesterly direction for more than 800 feet, if measured in a direct line. The route which must be traveled to reach this depth within the mountain, however, is so winding and irregular that at least a mile is passed before the terminus is reached.

There are en route many dark pits and precipices of unknown depth and therefore of a special interest. The various chambers and passages are beautifully decorated with a sparkling crust of limestone crystals and from the roof hang myriads of stalactites.

A Glimpses of Our National Monuments report published in 1930 said this about the park:

The entrance to Shoshone Cavern, high up near the summit of Cedar Mountain, overlooking the Shoshone River and the Cody entrance road to Yellowstone National Park, is very picturesque. It is the sort of cave opening that one reads about in story books, being located among rugged cliffs, with pine trees scattered here and there among the rocks. The entrance is about 20 feet wide and 6 feet high, and is in a fractured zone in a massive bed of limestone.

The main cavern follows a fairly straight course, as though located in a large fault in the rock and extends into the mountain about 2,500 feet. There are a few side passages, but all are believed to be short, although as yet these have not been fully explored. Entering the cavern, one soon comes to two descending ladders; then after following the descending floor of the cave, two more ladders are reached, and finally a fifth ladder. At the foot of this ladder the passage turns toward the slope of the mountain, but still continues to descend. The air is very clear and the ventilation is good throughout.

The walls of the cavern are well covered by incrustations of crystals and dripping formations, mostly white, but some brownish or reddish in color. Some of the crystals are sharp and pointed, others resemble rock candy, and some of the formations are curious. The cavern is lacking in large stalactites and stalagmites, but is extremely interesting, as is any large subterranean passage. The rooms of the cave are not of great size, the largest being perhaps 40 feet wide, with a low ceiling about 8 feet high. At other points the openings run up to 50 feet or more, but the walls are only a few feet apart.

The Shoshone Cavern is located about 4 miles from Cody, on the south side of the Shoshone River. The automobile road from Cody to Yellowstone National Park passes within about a mile of the cavern. From this road visitors proceed for half a mile along a level trail on the rim of the river canyon, and then a switchback trail is reached leading up the mountain. The trail traverses a picturesque canyon, narrow and wooded, and ends at the foot of two ladders which reach the entrance of the cave. The length of the switch back trail is about a half mile and the elevation climbed is nearly a thousand feet. A visit to the cave may be made in from four to six hours from Cody, and the visitor is well repaid for the time and effort. Cody is reached by the Burlington Railroad, and is on the direct route of the National Park-to-Park Highway. The Cody or eastern entrance is perhaps the most popular automobile entrance to Yellowstone.

The monument, which covers an area of 210 acres, was created September 21, 1909. At present [1930] the monument is not open to visitors.

Small wonder that this park was still closed to the public 21 years after it was established! Several salient facts leap off the pages when you read these descriptions. Shoshone Cavern was situated in a high, remote location in rugged mountains. Getting there required a physically challenging hike, part of it on a steep, winding trail. Once there, a visitor found no amenities. Instead, he found a ladder-access cave that was difficult, perhaps dangerous, to tour. When through, he had to make his way out by the same arduous route he used to get there. This was a cave to be visited by fit, adventuresome people with lots of time on their hands, not the general public.

Constructing an access road and converting Shoshone Cavern into a public cave with related visitor services and infrastructure would be very expensive. Only a very special cave would merit that kind of investment. But this wasn’t Mammoth Cave or Carlsbad Caverns; it was just Shoshone Cavern. It would be a “minor” park s long as it existed.

It didn’t make good sense to keep the cave within the embrace of the park system primarily to protect it, either. There was no clear and present danger that the cave’s resources would be vandalized or stolen in the absence of national park stewardship.

There’s a thing you can do with a national park that shouldn’t be a national park, or which isn’t worth the money you’d need to spend on it. You can just subject it to benign neglect. You don’t spend money on facilities and staffing. You don’t open it to the public. You just mark time as the years or decades go by. You see that the required reports are filed. And then, after the principles have died or lost interest, and when nobody really cares much anymore, you just give it a quiet death by delisting it. That was the fate of South Dakota’s Fossil Cycad National Monument (1922-1957), South Carolina’s Castle Pinckney National Monument (1933-1956), Colorado’s Wheeler National Monument (1908-1950), and several others, including Wyoming’s Shoshone Cavern National Monument.

Caught up in the politics that surrounded the addition of Jackson Hole National Monument to Grand Teton National Park, it was transferred to the city of Cody in 1951, legislatively abolished in 1953, and deleted from the park system in 1954.
Shoshone Cavern was restored to federal ownership after being under private management for a while. It is now under BLM management with very limited public access. There are locked gates at both the access road and the cave entrance.


Wyoming in particular has as part of the deal (see ) that added Jackson Hole to Grand Teton NP a rule that stops presidents from creating monuments in Wyoming without the consent of Congress (i.e., in essence, without making them national parks). This was because FDR with one fell swoop created Jackson Hole National Monument, protecting the area, despite years of congressional efforts to block the expansion of Grand Teton NP. So, the deal in the end was that Jackson Hole National Monument would be added to Grand Teton if this limit on presidential power was in place for Wyoming.

Jim Macdonald
The Magic of Yellowstone
Yellowstone Newspaper
Jim's Eclectic World

Imagine all the "minor" national parks waiting to be decommissioned if the Nixon administration had gone through with its idea of creating a new national park for each of the 50 states during the Bicentennial. Some folks in South Dakota were recently reminiscining online about it:

Some existing national parks probably should be delisted. I'll be writing more about this later.

I'm wondering if Hohokam Pima National Monument would be on your list for "delisting". Like Shoshone Cavern, it has never been opened to the public. On the other hand, there is also no question that "Snaketown", which Hohokam Pima National Monument protects, is a nationall-significant resource. To me, this raises something of a conundrum. I'd imagine that the National Monument/National Park System status affords a great deal of protection to the "Snaketown" resources - but can a National Park be solely about protection? Or does there also have to be a visitation element as well?

Here is what you learn when you go to the home page of Hohokam Pima National Monument, which was authorized in 1972 to protect an ancient Hohokam village (Snaketown):

The Monument is located on the Gila River Indian Reservation and is under tribal ownership. The Gila River Indian Community has decided not to open the extremely sensitive area to the public. There is no park brochure, passport stamp, picture stamp or other free literature available.

Is Snaketown worth preserving? Of course! But to say that the managerial arrangement for Snaketown is inconsistent with the concept of a national park is an understatement of gargantuan proportions. This one would be near the top of my list for transfer and decommissioning.

Here is the statement included at the bottom of an email message I just got from the Public Affairs Officer of a major park. I've highlighted the relevant words.

The National Park Service cares for special places saved by the American
people so that all may experience our heritage.

How about Yucca House National Monument in Colorado? Unexcavated, uninterpreted, virtually unvisited and unstaffed and managed by nearby Mesa Verde National Park, it seems Yucca House ought to be included as part of Mesa Verde, or developed such that there would be some sort of interpretation at the site to illustrate for the public the significance of an unexcavated Ancestral Puebloan site.

The so called Poverty Point National Monument is another prime candidate. While Congress made the declaration in 1988 to take this amazing prehistoric site in federal hands, the state of Louisiana believes their Poverty Point State Park is perfectly fine and does not even think about handing it over.

Poverty Point presents a particularly interesting case in the parlor game of "delisting." Without Federal management, it would certainly be a prime candidate. On the other hand, the US has recently put Poverty Point on its "Tentative List" - which is the first step towards being promoted to UNESCO World Heritage Site status. To me, there is something inherently disconnected between a site having UNESCO WHS status on one hand, and then being run by a State or Local agency on the other hand (ala Cahokia Mounds in Illinois or Monticello in Virginia.) Granted, the UNESCO WHS does not contain an "experience" or "enjoyment" element ala National Park Service status, but I still think that on the basis of significance alone that those sites in the US that are of world-class significance should be included in the National Park System, rather than being left on the outside.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide