You are here

Would You Love Zion National Park As Much If It Were Called Mukuntuweap National Park?

Share

Horace Albright was acting director of the National Park Service in 1918 when, with a stroke of the pen, he redesignated Mukuntuweap National Monument, changing the name to Zion National Monument. NPS photo.

Situated near Springdale in southwestern Utah, Zion National Park is one of America’s most popular national parks (annual visitation 2.6 million). This remarkable park might very well be called Mukuntuweap National Park today were it not for unhappy Mormons and a faithful sidekick standing in for an iconic National Park Director who suffered terrible bouts of depression. It’s a fascinating story.

In the early 1850s, Mormon pioneers dispatched from Salt Lake City by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints leadership became the first white settlers of the Virgin River region in southwestern Utah. In 1851 they settled in the Cedar City area and began growing cotton and other crops. (Historians know this as the “cotton campaign,” and the early Mormon cotton growing region of the southern Utah plateaus is known as “Mormon Dixie.”) By 1858, the Mormon-settled area had pushed 75 miles up the Virgin River corridor into the immediate vicinity of Zion Canyon. At this time, these remote canyonlands were wild and barely explored.

The remarkable physical feature we now call Zion Canyon is located on the southern part of the Markagunt Plateau where it is deeply dissected by the Virgin River and its tributaries. Erosion has left deep canyons (slot-like in many places), soaring cliffs, and huge monoliths. Though strikingly beautiful, this was a harsh environment. And it belonged to the Southern Paiute Indians.

Before a settlement toehold could be established, the Mormons first had to know what sort of a place it was and whether it could be farmed. This exploration task was assigned to a young Mormon missionary and translator named Nephi Johnson. Enlisting the aid of a Southern Pauite guide, Johnson made his way into the main canyon in 1858. Upon his return, he rendered a favorable report on the agricultural potential of the canyon floor.

In 1861, Mormon pioneer Joseph Black became the first white to establish a farm on the narrow canyon floor. By 1862, several farming families had founded the town of Springdale just outside the mouth of Zion Canyon.
In 1863, a Mormon settler named Isaac Behunin built a one-room log cabin (near the site of Zions Lodge) and farmed tobacco, sugar cane, and fruit trees. It was Behunin who named the place Zion Canyon.

Zion is a biblical word meaning a place of peace and refuge or sanctuary. It is an exceedingly important word to Mormons because it symbolizes a concept central to their history, or more specifically, to their heritage as refugees and pioneers in the western U.S. Persecuted in the eastern states, the early Mormons fled to the Great Basin and the Rocky Mountains beginning on the late 1840s. The Mormon pioneers who struggled to establish an essentially independent Mormon realm (Deseret) are said to have “gathered to Zion.” Eventually, the term Zion itself took on meaning as a symbol of Mormonism, embracing such qualities as courage, dedication to the cause, physical endurance, resoluteness, ingenuity, and faith.

To Isaac Behunin and other Mormons, applying the name Zion to the canyon in which they lived and worked was a profoundly important expression of cultural possession, not just personal ownership. These canyonlands were once fearsome wilderness, but now they had been made habitable by Mormon pioneers at great sacrifice. Limited arable land, poor soils, periodic flooding (some of it catastrophic), and other factors made agriculture quite risky in the upper Virgin River region. Mormons did not have it easy here.

After a while, almost all of the Paiutes died (mostly from diseases) or moved south to new homes. Whatever else the great canyon now called Zion might be, it was not, and would never again be, an Indian place. It was a Mormon place.

Mormon isolation ended in the 1860s and 1870s with the arrival of outside surveying expeditions, the railroads, and growing numbers of non-Mormon (Gentile) miners and ranchers. But Mormons continued to farm in Zion Canyon until it was federally protected in 1909.

The John Wesley Powell expedition entered the Zion Canyon vicinity in 1869 after their first trip through the Grand Canyon. In 1872, Powell and geologist Grove Karl Gilbert returned to explore Zion Canyon. At that time, Powell named the canyon Mukuntuweap, believing it to be the proper name of the place when it belonged to the Paiutes.

Mukuntuweap is sometimes translated as “straight arrow,” but expert opinion holds that it means “straight canyon” in Southern Pauite. The term may relate to the very high, near-perpendicular canyon walls.

In the decades following the Powell expeditions, the beauty and geologic wonders of the canyon and monoliths like Cathedral Mountain, Temple of Sinawava, Great White Throne, and the Great Temple (situated near the canyon entrance) were brought to public attention by artists and photographers.

Artist Frederick S. Dellenbaugh played an especially important role. Dellenbaugh spent part of the summer of 1903 painting in Zion Canyon, and his paintings attracted a good deal of attention when they were exhibited the next year at the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair.

Dellenbaugh also published an article about Zion Canyon ("A New Valley of Wonders") in the January 1904 issue of Scribner's Magazine. Speaking of the Great Temple, he said:

One hardly knows just how to think of it. Never before has such a naked mountain of rock entered our minds. Without a shred of disguise its transcendent form rises pre-eminent [sic]. There is almost nothing to compare to it. Niagara has the beauty of energy; the Grand Canyon of immensity; the Yellowstone of singularity; the Yosemite of altitude; the ocean of power; this Great Temple of eternity.

On July 31, 1909, President William Howard Taft proclaimed Mukuntuweap National Monument. Local residents were shocked and angry. Zion Canyon had been brought within the embrace of the National Park System, but it had been preserved under the historical Indian name for the place.

This was considered a blunt insult to the Mormon heritage of Zion Canyon, and by extension, an insult to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Mormons in general, and residents of the Zion Canyon area in particular, complained loudly and bitterly.

In 1918, the acting Director of the newly created National Park Service, Horace Albright, took matters into his own hands and changed the park's name to Zion National Monument. That settled that.

Albright was in a position to take this action because the iconic Director of the new agency, Stephen Tyner Mather, was suffering one of his periodic disabling bouts of depression. Albright, who had been appointed assistant director of the agency in May 1917, was acting director 1917-1919, and in this capacity launched the new agency’s operations. Mather eventually left office in January 1929 after suffering a stroke. Albright replaced him, serving as Director from January 12, 1929 - August 9, 1933.

Congress enlarged and redesignated the monument Zion National Park on November 19, 1919. The Kolob section, which was proclaimed a separate Zion National Monument in 1937, was incorporated into the park in 1956.

Comments

I am Australian. I used to live in Wingecarribee Street. Terrible things were committed against native Australians and the least I can do is pronounce their names and be proud to honour them. If people aren't intelligent enough to be touched by the word Mukuntuweap and its meaning and the disgraceful way this land was wrested from the people who owned it, in the European sense, I think they come to this amazing place to climb all over it and take photos and be thoroughly materialistic. I can stay at home and watch amazing footage without trampling all over it and depositing my Eureopen leftovers. I'm going to find out more about Southern Pauti.
Zion - what a disgrace.


I'm commenting well after this article was written, but as I was writing myself on Zion, and have spent quite a lot of time there, I thought I'd weigh in.  While I wouldn't visit a place or not visit based on name alone, I do admit to feeling a bit of a draw when presented with particularly romantic-sounding place names.  So it wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that, data in hand, names do in fact impact visitor numbers.  I'm sure someone has collated the necessary data to establish this.

Also, the name Mukuntuweap, being American Indian (and I believe specifically Southern Paiute), is a name that predates Zion, at least when applied to this canyon.  Powell did not invent the name after all.  It's possible that he got it wrong, but at least he didn't name it after some benefactor back east.  He knew it belonged to the S. Paiute and, despite his personal biases against certain native groups for the way they made a living, he respected them enough to use the name.  

Also, as Beamis implies, it doesn't matter whether Southern Paiutes actually lived there.  If they hunted or visited at all, you can be sure they had a name for this immense canyon.  It may not have been Mukuntuweap.  But again, that doesn't matter as Beamis would have us believe.  The fact is that in this time it matters whether names of places that once belonged to native groups are in their language.  It's a simple matter of respect.  And Beamis also has it wrong when he suggests that because the Southern Paiutes did not have a written language the name is somehow less accurate or geniune.

All that said, I don't get too excited about place names.  They have always been influenced by political and other forces, factors that give little thought to either accuracy or what the original inhabitants called them.  I don't think we need put too much value on the existing names.  They might be the 2nd (or 5th or 10th) name for the place after all.  So I generally don't mind very much when they are changed.  But I also don't think we need to scour all of the place names and change them to reflect the political climate of the present.  That seems silly.  

The Mormons have a lot of political power in this part of the country, but those settlers moved into areas that belonged to other groups.  Those natives died of diseases brought by Europeans.  They were essentially forced out.  It wouldn't be a bad thing to have the name reflect the area's original heritage.  But Mormons here would never allow that.  Too many still hold on to the myth that their progenitors moved into an empty Godforsaken wilderness, instead of accepting the truth of things. 


are you sure that this is actually true? where are your sources? I honestly wont believe this unless you tell me your sources, but the only thing i believe is its original name, so what were your sources? Are you making this up?


Beamis quite clearly is pushing his or her point of view, and it's not terribly hard to deduce why that might be. Michael Flaherty is spot on in his deconstruction of Beamis' arguments. 

I, for one, use Mukuntuweap. I don't like what Zion is associated with. 


Touche! That's brilliant! I've visited and even worked a season at Zion. It's gorgeous no matter what you call it. I'm all for preservation of unique landscapes... escalante e.g..... but even in 6 months I got to witness a little of what Edward Abbey was talking about. We're our own worst enemy. I can't begin to imagine how the indigenous peoples of Alaska felt about Mt McKinley. Denali! Denali! It's not just an SUV. However, I would visit under any name. Thank you again..... you made my day!


I'd love it even MORE!


This hurts my heart. Religions have no respect or understanding of sacred, im sorry they were bitter about Taft calling it it's original name, but it should have stayed that way. The Mormons had no right to have it Changed, they are already living on Stolen land. 


Great article. Just one thing Stephen Mather's  middle name wss Tyng.(I attended the high school named after him in Chicago)


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.